Tourism groups resign from Holyrood ‘sham’

Want to read more?

We value our content and access to our full site is only available with a  subscription. Your subscription entitles you to 7-day-a-week access to our website, plus a full digital copy of that week’s paper to read on your pc/mac or mobile device.  In addition, your subscription includes access to digital archive copies from 2006 onwards.

Just want to read one issue? No problem you can subscribe for just one week (or longer if you wish).

Already a subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Several of Scotland’s leading tourism organisations have resigned from the Scottish Government’s Working Group on Short-Term Lets, claiming it has failed to fulfil its remit and it is not fit for purpose.

Representatives of the Association of Scotland’s Self-Caterers, Airbnb, the Scottish B&B Association, and the UK Short Term Accommodation Association have quit the group en masse, citing its inability to address concerns the industry has raised over
proposed new measures.

Industry figures have also accused the Scottish Government of deliberately ‘shifting the goalposts’ on its policy intentions and acting with disregard towards the sector, which has suffered immense hardship throughout the Covid-19 pandemic.

Earlier this year, the Scottish Government withdrew its licensing proposals ahead of the election as they were widely recognised as not being fit for purpose, and they committed to respond to stakeholder concerns through the working group.

However, the tourism bodies have highlighted the lack of significant changes in the legislation impacting traditional self-catering and B&Bs, as well as home-sharers, despite representatives of both sectors acting in good faith, as grounds for quitting the group. In fact, additional provisions have been added to the legislation, with some guest houses now being caught up in the plans.

Further, they have also accused the government, which is now on its third consultation on short-term lets in four years, of acting with ‘cavalier disregard and indifference’ towards the sector’s concerns about the impending restrictive licencing scheme and of ignoring their proposals for a more workable, proportionate and cost- effective mandatory programme of registration.

Nearly half of self-catering operators are expected to leave the sector should the plans come into force, thereby jeopardising the recovery of Scottish tourism from the pandemic.

All the organisations involved in the walk-out have been responsible, willing, and positive parties to the discussions, providing key industry insight and evidence-based analysis, but have been met with obtuse responses and a reluctance to engage, the latest of which represents the final straw for the industry.

The Association of Scotland’s Self-Caterers chief executive, Fiona Campbell, said: ‘Despite our best efforts, and those of our colleagues across Scottish tourism, this working group has been revealed as nothing but a sham and therefore we have decided to leave it.

‘Throughout the entire process, while we have acted in good faith, this government has continually shifted the goalposts and acted with cavalier disregard and indifference towards our sincere concerns and innovative ideas.

‘Throughout the Covid-19 pandemic, and long-before that, the Scottish tourism industry has been an example for others to follow – it is therefore extremely disappointing that our government has not held itself to the same standards and failed to back small business at this crucial time.’

Chairman of the Bed & Breakfast Association, David Weston, added: ‘Leaving the working group is not a decision that my colleagues and I have taken lightly but there seems little point in remaining.

‘We have been frustrated at every turn and it will be Scottish B&Bs that suffer if we continue to take part in what has become nothing but a charade.

‘Our members expect us to act in their best interests, and in the interests of the broader tourism sector, and it has been made abundantly clear that neither the working group nor the Scottish Government are interested in that type of dialogue.’